fbp reconstruction technique (Philips Healthcare)
Structured Review

Fbp Reconstruction Technique, supplied by Philips Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fbp+reconstruction+technique/fbp+reconstruction+technique/pmc05355502-66-5-14
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Low-dose CT imaging of a total hip arthroplasty phantom using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopedic metal artifact reduction"
Article Title: Low-dose CT imaging of a total hip arthroplasty phantom using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopedic metal artifact reduction
Journal: Skeletal Radiology
doi: 10.1007/s00256-017-2580-2
Figure Legend Snippet: Images acquired at 140 kVp and 4.0 mGy reconstructed with a filtered back projection (FBP), b iDose 4 level 4, and c IMR level 2 with the use of O-MAR. Lower noise values and improved overall image quality can be observed in images reconstructed with IMR level 2 compared with FBP and iDose 4
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Reference CT numbers, signal-to-noise-ratios (SNRs), and contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNRs) for filtered back-projection (FBP), iterative reconstruction iDose 4 (levels 2, 4, and 6), and iterative model-based reconstruction (IMR; levels 1, 2, and 3) at CT dose indexes (CTDI vol ) of 40.0, 32.0, 24.0, 16.0, 8.0, and 4.0 mGy at 120 and 140- kVp without the influence of metal artifacts. Reference values were determined by averaging values of the unaffected pellets L0, L4, R0, and R4
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Images acquired at 140 -kVp and CDTI vol of 24.0 mGy reconstructed with a FBP, b FBP + O-MAR, c iDose 4 level 4, d iDose 4 level 4 + O-MAR, e IMR level 2, and f IMR level 2 + O-MAR. IMR level 2 and O-MAR results ( f ) show the least noise with reduced metal artifacts compared with conventional FBP and iDose 4 reconstructions
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: A 24.0-24.0 mGy (instead of 24.0-mGy)mGy acquisition at 140 - kVp reconstructed with a FBP and b iDose 4 level 4. c A 4.0-4.0 mGy (instead of 4.0-mGy)mGy acquisition at 140- kVp reconstructed with IMR level 2 and O-MAR. IMR and O-MAR results in c show a clearly improved image quality with reduced metal artifacts compared with a and b reconstructed with FBP and iDose 4 , while reducing radiation dose by 83%
Techniques Used:
Related Articles
other:Article Title: Low-dose CT imaging of a total hip arthroplasty phantom using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopedic metal artifact reduction Article Snippet: All scans were reconstructed with FBP, iDose 4 and IMR with and without Article Title: Iterative reconstruction improves image quality and preserves diagnostic accuracy in the setting of blunt solid organ injuries. Article Snippet: This study aims to investigate the effect of iterative reconstruction (IR) on MDCT image quality and radiologists’ ability to diagnose and grade blunt solid organ injuries.. One hundred (100) patients without and 52 patients with solid organ injuries were scanned on a 64-slice MDCT scanner using reference 300 mAs, 120 kVp, and fixed 75 s delay.. Raw data was reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and three levels of iterative reconstruction (Philips iDose levels 2, 4, and 6). |